Geared Gambling with ETBs


One of the fastest growing segments of the investment industry has been the market for exchange-traded funds (ETFs). According to the Investment Company Institute, the ETF market had over 1375 funds with net assets exceeding $1.8 trillion as of July 2014 (click HERE). More than 5.7 million US households (>5%) own an exchange-traded product.  The market for ETFs began in 1993 when State Street launched the S&P 500 index fund (ticker: SPY) with an initial capitalization of $6.6 million. As of today, the SPY fund had more than $190 billion in assets.

As the assets within ETFs ballooned, the number of new products offered by Wall Street rapidly expanded beyond passively managed low-fee equity index offerings. Over time, companies such as Direxion, VelocityShares, and ProShares introduced leveraged and inverse betting tools that promised multiples (2x, 3x, etc.) and negative multiples (-2x, -3x, etc.) of the index or benchmark they tracked.

So What? I believe these leveraged and inverse products are better thought of as gambling products rather than investment vehicles. The main reason I say so is they promise multiples and negative multiples of the daily performance of a particular index, creating wildly divergent performance from an unsophisticated buyer’s expectations—at much higher fees! (click HERE for more). Who other than gamblers care about the daily move in a particular investment opportunity?  Surely no serious investor expects to profitably bet on one-day moves, which are often statistically random.


Consider the chart below, which I think tells the story. Over the past year, GLD (exchange-traded gold) rose by 2%.  Had you invested in the 3x leveraged gold product (UGLD), you would have lost 1% (vs. the expected +6%).  And had you invested in the -3x inverse gold product (DGLD), you would have lost ~18% (vs. the expected -6%).   That’s right, it didn’t matter if you were bullish or bearish, you lost money playing the inverse or leveraged game!  Further, both DGLD and UGLD charge investors a 1.35% investment fee, versus the 0.40% expense ratio for GLD, a meaningful difference in a world of extremely low interest rates.


When I see something that has feathers, webbed feet, enjoys water, and quacks, I call it a duck.  Perhaps the time has come for regulators to mandate that these products be called what they actual are: exchange traded bets (ETBs).  What’s next?  Wynn Resorts to offer the Emerging Markets 20x Bull ETB? Or perhaps the Asian Luxury Consumer 40x ETB sponsored by Las Vegas Sands?


Subscribe To My Newsletter